<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<!-- RSS generation done by UBB.threads(tm) on Wed, 09 May 2012 22:41:09 CDT -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>RSS Feed for NEC 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php</link>
		<description>RSS Feed for NEC 2008</description>
		<generator>IAEI Florida Chapter - UBB.threads(tm)</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2012 Chapter Hotel Information</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8852/Re_2012_Chapter_Hotel_Informat.html#Post8852</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> odellkewish:<br />
			Great topic, keep myself through looking it]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 23:41:08 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Visual Alarms</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8847/Re_Visual_Alarms.html#Post8847</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			Thanks for the reply Terry.  Actually, I didn't know that about Key West.  I'm not surprised at the lawyers, and in many cases they will &quot;ham it up&quot; on the actual complaint to the court.  Of course, this is just my opinion.  <br /><br />I spent most of my day studying codes and I came up with a thing or (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 09:39:03 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Selective Coordination of Circuit Breakers</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8842/Re_Selective_Coordination_of_C.html#Post8842</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Mike Timpanaro:<br />
			Heinz<br />I have seen the time current trip curve charts you are talking about and with a quick flip through, coordination is not posible in the unlatching region as you have noted.  I think that Bryan said it as it is.<br /><br /> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You really have no choice but to require S.C. in compliance with the (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:03:18 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Nonmetallic Extensions</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8838/Re_Nonmetallic_Extensions.html#Post8838</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			I agree this is rather poor code arrangement.<br /><br />In my opinion, nonmetallic surface extensions installed to comply 382.10(A),(B), &amp; 382.15 shall only be in a building used for residential or office purposes per 382.10(C).<br /><br />Only concealable nonmetallic extensions can be used in buildings for (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:20:51 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: &amp;quot;Swim Spa&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8814/Re_quot_Swim_Spa_quot.html#Post8814</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> SOwings:<br />
			I am assuming this apparatus is on a porch outside the home. This would make it an outdoor installation. If it physically is in the home then you could call it indoors. <br />Regardless of being indoors or outdoors, pool or spa, the lights are too close to the water line and the fan is too close to (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:38:44 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2010 FBC - Electrical Code Changes</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8780/Re_2010_FBC_Electrical_Code_Ch.html#Post8780</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Here is a list of the significant code changes for ALL trades in case you haven't seen it...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:25:46 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Transformer primary and secondary conductors</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8761/Re_Transformer_primary_and_sec.html#Post8761</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			10-4, then I agree with the gang, can't find that requirement.  I just checked 300 again just now.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:00:44 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Low Voltage</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8756/Re_Low_Voltage.html#Post8756</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> DAEngelhart:<br />
			Updated statement (as it seems I could not edit my previous post); typically building plans that indicate conduit with pullstrings for the indicated locations does not provide wiring information for which either a revision for the wiring/cabling information is provided, or a separate permit (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:01:04 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Temporary power</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8755/Re_Temporary_power.html#Post8755</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> DAEngelhart:<br />
			Not too many t-poles installed here, but I would think that if they (whom ever set up the account for the power by the utility; FPL, LCEC) stop paying for the power by the utility, the utility would disconnect it themselves. Otherwise, there is no official procedure, and I believe the utility (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:42:22 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Chargers - Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt, etc., etc.</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8742/Re_Chargers_Nissan_Leaf_Chevy_.html#Post8742</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			Maybe I'm reading it wrong...?]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:16:03 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: LISTING FOR SAUNA</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8719/Re_LISTING_FOR_SAUNA.html#Post8719</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			Thank you.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:57:29 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Junction boxes in attics</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8710/Re_Junction_boxes_in_attics.html#Post8710</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> inspector32513:<br />
			PS:   the SR-71   is on display at he &quot;Air Force Armament Museum&quot; in Ft. Walton Beach Florida.  a beautiful aircraft.  Gains 11&quot; in length when at Mach 3  due to skin heating by air friction.    The fuel tanks would leak at ground temperature.  the (kerosene) leaking out would flame-  causing (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:27:15 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: NEMA Southern Area Field Rep Vacancy</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8705/Re_NEMA_Southern_Area_Field_Re.html#Post8705</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			For more information about the NEMA field program, follow this link:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nema.org/stds/fieldreps/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.nema.org/stds/fieldreps/</a>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:04:04 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2011 / 2014 NEC Adoption</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8701/Re_2011_2014_NEC_Adoption.html#Post8701</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> ronwampler:<br />
			Who's on first? Whats 'is name?]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:27:26 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Solar Panels installed on Light Poles</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8686/Re_Solar_Panels_installed_on_L.html#Post8686</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			That is a great point about the labeling. I did not get much slack so far after I red tagged it.  I was only there about 5 minutes (been pushed for time lately) so if I can get more details I will post back.  If I ever get time I may also give a call to Wiley.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:49:53 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: How many inspections is too many?</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8684/Re_How_many_inspections_is_too.html#Post8684</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nick Sasso</div><div class="ubbcode-body">10-4, didn't know that I could. </div></div><br />Let me know if you are not able to.<br />Of course you also are able to censor posts, though not suggested on this site.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:18:22 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Overcurrent protection for residential cooking equipment.</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8653/Re_Overcurrent_protection_for_.html#Post8653</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> SOwings:<br />
			The question is about cooktops and wall mounted oves with an individual branch circuit that are below 8 3/4 kw. 422.10 tells you to use 220.55 and when you do you really need to read note 4 because IF they are not ranges, you use the nameplate rating. 210.19(A)(3) says this but we all get (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:58:12 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Generator (portable) power inlet</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8652/Re_Generator_portable_power_in.html#Post8652</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> DAEngelhart:<br />
			A generator inlet is a receptacle per NEC 100; IMHO.<br />I wonder what the difference in '11NEC 406.9(B)(1)&amp;(2) is other than the requirement of the weather resistant device in (1).]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:19:26 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Panel Feeders</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8650/Re_Panel_Feeders.html#Post8650</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> DAEngelhart:<br />
			As long as the engineer had the loads accurately accounted for and balanced in the service, I see no problem.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:54:51 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Continuing Education   Advanced Module</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8643/Re_Continuing_Education_Advanc.html#Post8643</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Unfortunatley we do not.<br /><br />The Advanced Module Course, 7995-A &quot;Advanced National Electrical Code on Listed &amp; Labeled Electrical Equipment&quot;, expired back in May and was not renewed.<br /><br />I have requested a discussion on Chapter education to be added to the January BOD meeting.  I am hoping the board (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:54:41 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: What constitutes a bend in conduit</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8634/Re_What_constitutes_a_bend_in_.html#Post8634</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> ronwampler:<br />
			As we all know there are many variables here. THWN or any nylon coated conductor pulls or even pushes thru ENT (smurf-tube). I have always adhered to the 3-90's and a pullbox or to what seemed the equivalent. Distance is also a factor even for straight pulls. Conduit fill and insulation type. (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:29:17 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Solar Farm</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8610/Re_Solar_Farm.html#Post8610</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: COTInspector</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Am I to late to give my 2 cents worth?</div></div><br /><br />Never too late, Neal.<br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: COTInspector</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nick, I have a couple of questions. <br />Is this an Utility interactive system?</div></div><br /><br />To the best of my knowledge - yes it is.<br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: COTInspector</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Are there (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:27:49 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Evaluation of &amp;quot;Alternative Equipotential Bonding Means&amp;quot; - Final Report</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8577/Re_Evaluation_of_quot_Alternat.html#Post8577</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">To: NEC CMP-17 Members<br /><br />From: Donny Cook, NEC CMP-17 Chair<br /><br />At the request of past Chair, Don Jhonson, the Fire Protection Research Foundation initiated a research project related to the NEC bonding requirements for perimeter surfaces of swimming pools. The final report for that project was (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:48:37 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Pool Pump Motor GFCI Protection FYI:</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8570/Re_Pool_Pump_Motor_GFCI_Protec.html#Post8570</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			We City of North Port / City of Venice have been enforcing GFCI protection of swimming pool pumps since May 28, 2011 to comply with the changes to ANSI/UL 1081...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:15:33 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: PV SYSTEM - Question on Disconnecting Means</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8557/Re_PV_SYSTEM_Question_on_Disco.html#Post8557</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SOwings</div><div class="ubbcode-body">We have not asked for Florida Solar lab certification, only a state solar contractor license (or unlimited). </div></div><br /><br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">377.705  Solar Energy Center; development of solar energy standards<br />(4)  FLORIDA SOLAR ENERGY CENTER TO SET STANDARDS, REQUIRE DISCLOSURE, SET TESTING (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:45:13 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Hot tub wiring</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8523/Re_Hot_tub_wiring.html#Post8523</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> ronwampler:<br />
			You didn't indicate 6/3 w/grd.NM cable so the answer is no.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:57:55 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2011 Code Change Webinar - FREE</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8513/Re_2011_Code_Change_Webinar_FR.html#Post8513</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Thanks Greg...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:20:19 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Geothermal Heat Pump</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8496/Re_Geothermal_Heat_Pump.html#Post8496</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			I just read the schematics and yes, they do have internal fuse protection...thanks!]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:09:10 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: SABC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8492/Re_SABC.html#Post8492</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> jumper:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ruben Rocha</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your final post in the other forum cleared up my problem with understanding what the real issue was with the home inspector.<br /><br />But anyway don't be a lurker here. This site is all about education and the NEC.<br />You don't need to be a inspector to contribute.<br />The nice (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:25:37 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Location of Gasoline Station Seal-offs</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8478/Re_Location_of_Gasoline_Statio.html#Post8478</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> inspector32513:<br />
			A little more information  (I have been 500 miles away due to a family medical situation)  There is a 20 minunite timer activated ventilation fan for the sump area.  BUT it is only for activation and min. 20 minute ventalation of the area before entry into 'confined space'.<br /><br />That solves the (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:40:49 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2011 NEC (pdf version)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8464/Re_2011_NEC_pdf_version.html#Post8464</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Mike Timpanaro:<br />
			Wy don't you just go to the NFPA web site and buy the pdf version.  It also comes in the handbook type.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 09:37:23 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: AMPilizer - The Power Optimizer</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8455/Re_AMPilizer_The_Power_Optimiz.html#Post8455</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			Here is my 2 cents.<br />Most all of the utilities here in Florida do not have a residential rate to provide a discount on power factor.<br />Only commercial customer rates have that option.<br /><br />So valid or not most all residential customers would not be able to take advantage of power factor correction. At (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:13:18 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Voltage Drop in the codes</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8452/Re_Voltage_Drop_in_the_codes.html#Post8452</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Also keep in mind that while Section 210.19 &amp; 215.2 can only recommend voltage drop limitations (FPNs), there are two (2) sections of the NEC that REQUIRE voltage drop limitations:<br /><br />Section 647.4(D) for Sensitive Electronic Equipment &amp; 695.7 for Fire Pumps...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:59:51 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Smoke alarm placement.......again.</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8411/Re_Smoke_alarm_placement_again.html#Post8411</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			I was bored so I started going through the 2012 IBC - Residential.  There is a requirement for a smoke alarm in a &quot;habitable&quot; attic but not an &quot;unhabitable&quot; attics.<br /><br />?  <img src="<<GRAEMLIN_URL>/confused.gif" alt="confused" title="confused" height="15" width="15" / <br /><br />So then I had to go into definitions to see what it (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:49:56 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: OSHA revokes Wyle Laboratories, Inc as NRTL</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8396/Re_OSHA_revokes_Wyle_Laborator.html#Post8396</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Yep...<br /><br />OSHA only recogizes 4 product standards organizations:<br /><br />ANSI<br />UL<br />ASTM<br />FM<br /><br />ONLY the OSHA - NRTL's are recognized to certify and test products to a standard by one of the above organizations.<br /><br />Confusion arises due to the fact that UL both writes the standards &amp; is a NRTL. But these two aspects of (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:57:58 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Dwelling unit / Firehouse?</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8389/Re_Dwelling_unit_Firehouse.html#Post8389</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> ronwampler:<br />
			This would be a mixed use R-2/S-2. It would not be a dwelling unit as much as a dormitory or group living arrangement. I would apply 210-8 and AFCI requirements. Where it gets tricky is in the kitchen. A commercial kitchen requires a Class I kitchen exhaust hood, grease duct and suppression. (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:07:41 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: New Requirement in the 2010 Florida Energy Conservation Code</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8388/Re_New_Requirement_in_the_2010.html#Post8388</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> ronwampler:<br />
			We will all be going to LED lighting eventually and gov. regs like this will be pointless... ]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:57:43 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Transformers and 110.26(A)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8383/Re_Transformers_and_110_26_A.html#Post8383</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Joe L. DuPriest:<br />
			Several good thought provoking opinions given.  Odd how a string can take a life of it's own. Going from 110.26 working space for a transformer to equipment located in closets, attics, and such.  How maybe it shouldn't really apply to receptacles and switches, to judgement calls, to (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:04:04 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Article 517</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8367/Re_Article_517.html#Post8367</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Paul J Cameron:<br />
			Thanks gentlemen, I also agree. ]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:37:35 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: AFCI Protection for Outets in Room Addition</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8356/Re_AFCI_Protection_for_Outets_.html#Post8356</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> John Belew:<br />
			Agree, AFCI would be required.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:17:31 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Citing a Lack of Usage, Costco Removes E.V. Chargers</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8342/Re_Citing_a_Lack_of_Usage_Cost.html#Post8342</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			This is a funny coincidence.  I was reading your response while sitting in a BOAF Energy Class presented by John England.<br /><br />He asked the class if we have ever heard of a 2-pole, 4-wire, solar clothes dryer.  Having an electrical background, I was picturing all sorts of configurations in my head (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:34:19 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Service Conductors in Parallel</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8335/Re_Service_Conductors_in_Paral.html#Post8335</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Mike Timpanaro:<br />
			I too now agree with Nick.  <br /><br />My first understanding was that the neutral first terminated into the polaris tap, than to bonded to the gutter. I would not have a problem with that, since it terminated with the other parallel neutral conductors at the same point.<br /><br />But with the new understanding, (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:41:45 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Recessed IC fixtures</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8289/Re_Recessed_IC_fixtures.html#Post8289</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			So what is your point?  That a 40W bulb will not be sufficient?  Agree, but I didn't design the place, I just inspect it.  The original poster had a valid point, and maybe red-tagging a final or two for this issue, it might make the builder reconsider using the inferior can with the 40W (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:15:17 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: New Receptacle</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8282/Re_New_Receptacle.html#Post8282</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I imagine the real problem is the market analysis came back that if they couldn't get this in under $5 a unit, nobody was going to buy it. <br />I am still not sure what it is good for. Most receptacles are not that conveniently placed to be plugging and unplugging things and isn't this, (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:13:03 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: TIA on spa bonding</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8280/Re_TIA_on_spa_bonding.html#Post8280</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> conner11:<br />
			I am glad they have made this change.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:33:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Electrical Code Coalition</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8279/Re_Electrical_Code_Coalition.html#Post8279</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Electrical Code Coalition issues new proclamations<br /><br />Statements signed in conjunction with Electrical Safety Month<br /><br />July 19, 2011— The Electrical Code Coalition, of which the International Association of Electrical Inspectors (IAEI) is a member, has issued a series of new proclamations in (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:33:28 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: low voltage wiring in Type II (5 story) Residence</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8262/Re_low_voltage_wiring_in_Type_.html#Post8262</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> SOwings:<br />
			Thanks, Bryan, thats about where I end up. FBC 712 requires penetrations of fire walls to be sealed and NEC 725 also requires floors to be sealed.<br />Just seems odd they would restrict NM cable but not others.<br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:29:20 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2014 National Electrical Code</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8252/Re_2014_National_Electrical_Co.html#Post8252</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Deadline for Submitting Proposals for NEC-2014: November 4, 2011 <br /><br />As a member, we welcome you to contribute your expertise in promoting code proposals to the NEC code-making panels. IAEI supports two members of each code-making panels, and we encourage you to write your proposals or comments (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:42:25 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: General AFCI  Questions</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8250/Re_General_AFCI_Questions.html#Post8250</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Dan Wellins:<br />
			I figured... Was just inquiring. Thank you]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 14:40:50 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Laundry Circuit</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8236/Re_Laundry_Circuit.html#Post8236</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			I don't believe the original question - was about plugging in portable devices, or a radio, or a night-lite, or a phone charger.<br /><br />One can cloud the issue 1000 different ways, but the intent of the code is clear and remains the same.<br /><br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:11 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2010 UL-IAEI Report</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8208/Re_2010_UL_IAEI_Report.html#Post8208</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I can understand some of your frustration. People tend to say &quot;U/L&quot; when they mean NRTL and I think U/L likes it that way. They really want to be THE lab so I can see them trying to minimize the validity of everyone else.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 15:39:43 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: SB 838 / HB 607 - Journeyman Requirement</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8191/Re_SB_838_HB_607_Journeyman_Re.html#Post8191</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> TerryR:<br />
			I agree with Ron.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:40:51 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2011 NEC Errata Sheet</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8175/Re_2011_NEC_Errata_Sheet.html#Post8175</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			A 2008 NEC Errata was never published...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:42:32 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Citizens Insurance &amp;amp; Aluminum Wiring</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8158/Re_Citizens_Insurance_amp_Alum.html#Post8158</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			FYI:<br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Please be aware that on April 4th at 3:00 pm the Electrical TAC will take up a discussion of effective remediation methods for aluminum wiring in residences. This has become a very important topic since many insurance companies have recently taken the position that they will not (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:01:53 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Apartments with no smoke alarms</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8152/Re_Apartments_with_no_smoke_al.html#Post8152</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			I agree...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:34:26 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Pool bonding - Ground mat - 680.26</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8137/Re_Pool_bonding_Ground_mat_680.html#Post8137</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gfretwell</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Where does the #8 go if this whole thing is sitting on an elevated plastic deck? </div></div><br />It goes on the green plastic screw. That is listed for use!<br />Mounted on the rest of the non-conductive material. <br />Smile.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:41:34 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Circuits not to be grounded</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8099/Re_Circuits_not_to_be_grounded.html#Post8099</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Heinz R.:<br />
			Bryan:<br />Seems I'm wrong again. I always thought Deloreans time travelled in very expensive sports cars with gull wing doors, sort of like the DMC-12.<br />In seriousness, I understand that one grounding is incidental while the other is intentional but is there any significant arcing difference (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:21:39 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Power company solutions</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8092/Re_Power_company_solutions.html#Post8092</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			I am not saying I agree with this.<br />But,<br />I have never seen that done on a overhead service.<br />Usually they will do that on a underground service.<br />If they have a bad conductor.<br />Then eventually a contractor shows up to re-trench the new conductors.<br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:02:49 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 250.104</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8079/Re_250_104.html#Post8079</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			I believe it is up to the AHJ and/or their representative to determine what is effectively bonded and what means or code section is to be used to make that bond AND not the design professional overseeing the project.<br /><br />Instead, the design professional should be detailing the means to make the (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:05:33 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Ideal Splice line connector</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8067/Re_Ideal_Splice_line_connector.html#Post8067</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			<a href="http://www.idealindustries.com/prodDetail.do?prodId=spliceline&amp;div=0&amp;l1=push-in"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.idealindustries.com/prodDetail.do?prodId=spliceline&amp;div=0&amp;l1=push-in</a><br /><br />They handed out a few of these at that ECF meeting where Bryan did the swimming pool talk.<br /><br />There has been an interesting conversation over on ECN forum about it.<br />One interesting thing is in the literature (specs PDF)<br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:03:23 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: NEC 422.31B and 34</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8065/Re_NEC_422_31B_and_34.html#Post8065</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nova:<br />
			Nick from your post; you would allow the control on the unit without the breaker lock? Ex. Kitchen not within sight of panelboard?]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:07:44 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Article 504</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8055/Re_Article_504.html#Post8055</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> hotsparks1:<br />
			I would say a seal off in the dispensor area for this cable is needed.art.514.9 (a)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:57:28 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: SO cord usage</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8049/Re_SO_cord_usage.html#Post8049</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> SOwings:<br />
			Several thing pop into my head on this. I believe going through the wall is like going through a ceiling. I say this because way back when I used to to service work and was called out to several stores where the fire dept. had busted them for cords through a wall (this may possibly be a NFPA (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:39:10 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Revision to UL676 - Standard for Underwater Luminaires</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8045/Re_Revision_to_UL676_Standard_.html#Post8045</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Hello Everyone,<br /><br />An important change has been made to UL676 Standard for Underwater Luminaires.  In short, the term “salt water” will be changed to “sea water” in reference to product markings and when determining suitability of use for underwater luminaires.  The change also stipulates that (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:57:56 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Florida Statute 489.503 (14) (a)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8042/Re_Florida_Statute_489_503_14_.html#Post8042</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lowvoltageworker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have a very good question this exemption 14 (a) what types of companies is the meant for?  Utilities or any company that opens a shop installing cable/coax or Cat5e wiring for Data/Phone?<br /><br />Also would it cover work subcontracted out to independant (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:09:13 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 1882-1940 Editions of the NEC Download</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8040/Re_1882_1940_Editions_of_the_N.html#Post8040</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			By the way, this doesn't apply to the NEC alone.  You can get pdf documents of many of the other standards such as the NFPA 780 (78) for lightning protection, and the NFPA 13 for Fire Sprinkler SYstems for example...  Most dating back to the early 1900's and before in some cases...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:30:53 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: New MyFloridaLicense.com Registration</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8037/Re_New_MyFloridaLicense_com_Re.html#Post8037</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Dear Licensee:<br /> <br />Over the past few weeks, DBPR has been in the process of upgrading its online services. We are working to put most of our applications online to streamline the application process and reduce licensure times. Until recently, we had been working with an outdated system, so an (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:42:14 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: ARE you using an AFCI tester and if so - WILL it trip the breaker?</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8036/Re_ARE_you_using_an_AFCI_teste.html#Post8036</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> psnorthrup:<br />
			UL still says the best way to test an AFCI breaker is to use the test button the breaker although sometimes I use a Cutler Hammer <br />AFCI tester to trip the circuit to see what goes off, It was the only tester that worked on the homeline afci breakers]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:20:35 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Online Resource for Building Officials and Electrical Professionals by UL</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8019/Re_Online_Resource_for_Buildin.html#Post8019</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			<br /><br />Resource for Building Officials:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/regulator/building/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/regulator/building/</a><br /><br /><br />Resource for Electrical Professionals:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/regulator/electrical/technicaltopics/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/regulator/electrical/technicaltopics/</a>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:51:21 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: buildings on fixed piers</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8018/Re_buildings_on_fixed_piers.html#Post8018</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I agree the rebar in concrete pilings is an attractive ground if you have access to it but that would have had to happen when the pier was built. I suppose that is something to consider if you know there will be a building out there when you permit the pier.<br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:39:59 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: UL Warns of Electrical Metallic Tubing (EMT) Elbows and Bends With Inadequa</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8006/Re_UL_Warns_of_Electrical_Meta.html#Post8006</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			UL Warns of Electrical Metallic Tubing (EMT) Elbows and Bends With Inadequate Corrosion Protection <br /><br />NORTHBROOK, Ill., (Date) - Underwriters Laboratories (UL) is notifying AHJs, electrical contractors, electricians and retailers that Electrical Metallic Tubing (EMT) elbows and bends (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:57:07 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: UL Warns of Electric Signs With Unauthorized UL Marks</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8005/Re_UL_Warns_of_Electric_Signs_.html#Post8005</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			UL Warns of Electric Signs With Unauthorized UL Marks <br /><br />Northbrook, Ill., -- Jan. 18, 2011: Underwriters Laboratories (UL) is notifying sign installers and Authorities Having Jurisdiction that electric signs manufactured by Speed Service Sign, British Columbia, Canada bear an unauthorized UL (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:54:55 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: New Electrical Contractor - BEST BUY?</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/8001/Re_New_Electrical_Contractor_B.html#Post8001</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			We have to believe if it is a licensed contractor, they will get a permit and install it in a way that the AHJ thinks is compliant.<br />If the world was perfect that is the way it would work  <img src="<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:35:27 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Mechanical Contractor Performing Electrical Work</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7995/Re_Mechanical_Contractor_Perfo.html#Post7995</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			This exemption has been around a long time. At least in pinellas county.<br />I recall whenever this issue came up the city of St. Pete always stated.<br />But it needs to be only allowed when replacing the same equipment. Which will not happen. Because the seer rating keeps going up. And the over (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:10:10 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: do not ground something using a SHEET METAL screw</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7990/Re_do_not_ground_something_usi.html#Post7990</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> SOwings:<br />
			The key word is &quot;machine screw&quot;. A machine screw has fine treads like a 6-32, 8-32, 10-24, 1/4-20 screw. A sheet metal screw is like a wood screw and has a coarse, winding thread. Machine screws have matching nuts to be used with them.<br />I hope this helps...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:31:21 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: odd arrangement for double-pole breakers</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7988/Re_odd_arrangement_for_double_.html#Post7988</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> psnorthrup:<br />
			I think that those of us who worked in the field, all did some things that at the time seemed clever and inovative and as Mike said made us good electricians able to adapt to adverse situations, but looking back are things that we as inspectors now know are unacceptable practices]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:31:43 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Is there a conflict between 220.61 and 240.4?</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7971/Re_Is_there_a_conflict_between.html#Post7971</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> mazda:<br />
			Thanks for the info....]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 06:01:42 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: NM installed under a house</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7964/Re_NM_installed_under_a_house.html#Post7964</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			Nick, if your house is truly a stem wall house, why didn't they fill the box with dirt and pour a slab floor? That is the way they build stem wall houses over here. ]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:22:24 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Red Light Cameras</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7956/Re_Red_Light_Cameras.html#Post7956</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">For years the state buildings, schools, universities, etc. were exempt from the building code and inspection.</div></div><br /><br />That is not exactly true. The state just did internal permitting out of the department of management services and after the law change in 1995-6 they had state licensed (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:09:58 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Arc-fault in cabana</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7937/Re_Arc_fault_in_cabana.html#Post7937</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I suppose you really need to look at the plan but the ones I see are more of a changing room and a bathroom. They are usually not big enough to be called a recreation room.. I suppose it really depends on how rich the people are. There are probably mother in law apartments that get called cabanas.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:34:07 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: phone and data wire installed in wet location</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7912/Re_phone_and_data_wire_install.html#Post7912</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> psnorthrup:<br />
			Try the 2010 UL White Book Category (DUZX) page 109  or the UL Website, Product marking on the Cable will indicate the use in accordance with that category]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:06:21 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: TIA for Bonding Requirements at Spas</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7899/Re_TIA_for_Bonding_Requirement.html#Post7899</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Paul J Cameron:<br />
			Also led to them not getting permits for spas.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:23:55 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Galvan Hammer-On Ground Clamps</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7898/Re_Galvan_Hammer_On_Ground_Cla.html#Post7898</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Now there's a lower cost, easier-to-install and more tamper-resistant way for utility crews to secure their grounding conductor connections to rod electrodes. <br /><br />One-piece Galvan Hammer-On Rod Clamps offer a simple compression-type connection. Their &quot;irreversible feature&quot; resists removal by (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:24:07 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Awning recall</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7892/Re_Awning_recall.html#Post7892</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			I used to subscribe to this site and post them but it seemed nobody cared.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:52:06 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Electrical Book Recommendation</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7888/Re_Electrical_Book_Recommendat.html#Post7888</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			For all of you that are electrical history buffs, I would like to recommend a recently published book and two related websites.   <br /><br />The book is called, “Where Discovery Sparks Imagination – A Pictorial History of Radio and Electricity” by, John D. Jenkins. <br /><br />The 200+ page book costs about $35.  I (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:50:54 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 110.14 Dissimilar Metals</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7886/Re_110_14_Dissimilar_Metals.html#Post7886</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I think this &quot;dissimilar metal&quot; thing is just a knee jerk from the aluminum problem that was more of a &quot;coefficient of linear expansion&quot; thing than a dissimilar metal thing but it has taken on a life of it's own now. <br />We make copper aluminum connections every day and never give it a second (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:47:11 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Panels and such mounted outdoors</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7855/Re_Panels_and_such_mounted_out.html#Post7855</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> SOwings:<br />
			When you look at 408.37(A) (panelboards) or 240.32 (enclosures for overcurrent protection), they both specifically refer you to 312.2(A) not 312.3. 312.3 appears to be describing loadcenters that are flush mounted.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:29:51 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Atticle 400.8(5) Cords in ceilings</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7847/Re_Atticle_400_8_5_Cords_in_ce.html#Post7847</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> SOwings:<br />
			Last note on this, I write to NFPA on this and got a most interesting response from Mark Cloutier as follows:<br /><br />This is in reply to your email concerning the National Electrical Code® 2008. The NFPA electrical staff cannot approve a particular design or arrangement, however I can provide some (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:11:26 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Just great - Siemens Recalls Circuit Breakers Due to Fire Hazard</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7845/Re_Just_great_Siemens_Recalls_.html#Post7845</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			I'm not an accountant but if I'm not mistaken this would qualify for a business loss -- a TAX write-off --  2.2 MILLION UNITS plus cost to produce and ship!!  Must have been one heck of a bad clip. Snif snif<br /><br />  <img src="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3736785/smells%20fishy.jpg" align="center" alt="" />  <br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:06:05 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Solar PV Guidelines and Checklist</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7838/Re_Solar_PV_Guidelines_and_Che.html#Post7838</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			This is great, thanks.  Also I think IAEI mag had an article on inspecting these systems, a while back.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:25:53 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Pool Water Bonding</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7811/Re_Pool_Water_Bonding.html#Post7811</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			I witnessed this same stunt performed by Mike Holt several years ago.  It was very dramatic.  While discussing gfci protection and the way people get shocked, he walks out into the crowd and takes a pitcher of ice water off one of the attendee's tables.  He proceeds to dip his relocatable (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:07:52 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Article 600.5a</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7797/Re_Article_600_5a.html#Post7797</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			I have served as an expert witness for a case that was a sign - electrocution death.  Same thing - circuit was not properly identified, and was on when they thought it was off.<br /><br />I follow your post except for the last sentence - <br /><span style="font-style: italic">&quot;Code only says you must provide at least one sign circuit.&quot;</span><br /><br (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:28:51 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Circuit Directory  NEC 408.4</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7784/Re_Circuit_Directory_NEC_408_4.html#Post7784</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Here's the panel directory in the Great Pyramid in Egypt:<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.google.com/url?source=imgres&amp;ct=img&amp;q=http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/hieroglyphics.jpg&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=aMGYTMG9N8T68Aa377jxDw&amp;ved=0CAQQ8wc4Bg&amp;usg=AFQjCNEcLxjPV-yCWi6zbmRSd8Y-Scq8-Q" title="httpwwwgooglecomurlsourceimgresampctimgampqhttpwwwjillstanekcomarchiveshieroglyphicsjpgampsaXampeiaMGYTMG9N8T68Aa377jxDwampved0CAQQ8wc4BgampusgAFQjCNEcLxjPVyCWi6zbmRSd8YScq8Q" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/url?source=imgres&...zbmRSd8Y-Scq8-Q</a><br /><br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:31:45 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Significant Changes in the 2011 NEC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7758/Re_Significant_Changes_in_the_.html#Post7758</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Mike Timpanaro:<br />
			Just to let everyone know I will be teaching the 2011 NEC Code Changes For the North Florida Division in <br />February (Marion County), <br />March (Jacksonville), and <br />April (Sumter County),<br /><br />Electrical Underwriters of NY<br />May (Otterkill, New York)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:45:27 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Lightning Protection Licensing and Permitting</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7742/Re_Lightning_Protection_Licens.html#Post7742</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> SOwings:<br />
			My Take on it:<br /><br />1) No, there are no provisions in 489 for licensing of this work. Nor are lightning systems listed in Ch. 1 of the items requiring permits or inspections.<br /><br />2) The building code does require lightning systems(references UL 780) for Hospitals and Nursing Homes and a risk assessment (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:04:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Free Preview of the 2011 NEC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7715/Re_Free_Preview_of_the_2011_NE.html#Post7715</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			NFPA offers complimentary preview of 2011 edition of the NEC<br /><br />Visitors to necplus.org will have first access to code<br /><br /> <br /><br />Please read the news release below.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nfpa.org/newsReleaseDetails.asp?categoryid=488&amp;itemId=48608&amp;rss=NFPAnewsreleases"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.nfpa.org/newsReleaseDetails.asp?categoryid=488&amp;itemId=48608&amp;rss=NFPAnewsreleases</a><br /><br /> <br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:10:10 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL HOME</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7695/Re_LOAD_CALCULATIONS_FOR_RESID.html#Post7695</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I went on the web site to see what Lee County says about permit requirements and the requirement just says &quot;electrical amps&quot; but that seems to get distilled down to &quot;sufficient&quot; electrical amps.<br />The only way to prove that is with a load calc, or so it seemed when I did it.<br />It may have been (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:59:20 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: GEC to footer steel</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7667/Re_GEC_to_footer_steel.html#Post7667</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			Ground rods are a waste of money in these cases. Bonding is the trick. Make all the grounding electrodes in all of the buildings one big GES and you have something.<br />In our case (IBM) we did not have access to the service without triggering complaints by everyone from the IBEW to the electrical (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:12:53 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Trial Court erred in granting temporary injunction to restore power</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7655/Re_Trial_Court_erred_in_granti.html#Post7655</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> ronwampler:<br />
			Thanx Nick. Interesting reading...We have an 'Unsafe Structures' program here and follow our City attorney's guidance very closely...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:34:45 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: NFPA 76</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7654/Re_NFPA_76.html#Post7654</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I used to design computer rooms and the trigger for applying 645 rules was when you wanted to use 645 exceptions to the regular chapter 3 rules.<br />Usually as soon as you put in a raised floor and had the hell hole aspects of that, it was a 645 computer room. The other issues are the &quot;loosy (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:21:56 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: PhotoVoltiac Inverter Connections</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7628/Re_PhotoVoltiac_Inverter_Conne.html#Post7628</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> inspector32513:<br />
			Thanks, <br />I did get the 2 CYCLE rather than two minute shutdown later.  The literature sent from the manufacturer (brochure) to the contractor stated the &quot;two minutes&quot;<br /><br />I also found that the Florida Net Metering law does not allow the utility to demand an &quot;Externally Operable Utility Disconnect (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:58:56 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Fraudulent ETL and UL logos in SE Florida</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7621/Re_Fraudulent_ETL_and_UL_logos.html#Post7621</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			What? They are saying the government is &quot;restraining the trade&quot; of illegal products? Isn't that what we pay them to do?]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:07:09 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: CPSC Warns of Dangerous Counterfeit Electrical Products</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7549/Re_CPSC_Warns_of_Dangerous_Cou.html#Post7549</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			CPSC Warns of Dangerous Counterfeit Electrical Products<br /><br />Jul 01, 2010 <br /><br />The Consumer Product Safety Commission is warning consumers that, unlike a fake purse or watch, counterfeit electrical products could pose the risk of injury or death. Counterfeit circuit breakers, power strips, extension (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:53:35 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Solar Contractor (CV)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7540/Re_Solar_Contractor_CV.html#Post7540</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			Interesting, but it does make sense if this is a grid tie system where the inverter will not put out if it doesn't see the utility.<br /><br />Assuming everything is working correctly. <br />We know solar equipment never breaks because they never include &quot;maintenance&quot; in those projections of pay back period.  <img (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:27:24 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: GFCI protection of ALL pool pumps - UL 1081</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7408/Re_GFCI_protection_of_ALL_pool.html#Post7408</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			I received this from UL today.  I believe this supports my proposal (E3450) to the Fl. Build. Comm. to delete Section 2705 of the FBC that adds an exception to 680.22(B) of the NEC.  My hope is this provision being added to the UL standard will get the Florida Pool and Spa lobby in line with (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:11:51 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Cord-connected Wood chipper.</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7398/Re_Cord_connected_Wood_chipper.html#Post7398</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Heinz R.:<br />
			Thanks for the info, folks. I suspected that something didn't add up. <br />But how about the 40A max. spec.? By the way, this product belongs to a neighbor, who called me in when he started blowing 20A fuses (yeah, it's an old house) and was told by the mfg. that he should install 30A  fuses. In (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:15:44 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 90.2</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7389/Re_90_2.html#Post7389</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: inspector32513</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Mr. Cameron, <br />... I know that the State does have inspectors, but they are NOT necessarily licensed inspectors under FSS 468; so it would not seem they could say they  were providing the oversight ...  <br />Lynn Adams<br /> </div></div><br /><br />For the disciplines regulated by the CLIB (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:29:26 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Florida Solar Approval verses NRTL</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7364/Re_Florida_Solar_Approval_vers.html#Post7364</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I have been looking at one of these systems for almost a year. I spent some time trying to get an answer why Florida was not giving a rebate on these since it is probably the best use of solar PV I have seen but they do not do it. Now the whole program is broke so it is academic. <br />The big (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:38:28 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 680.10</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7363/Re_680_10.html#Post7363</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			You are a sick puppy looking for punishment from the masses.<br /><br />But to have some fun under the deck it appears that you could dig a small trench and  slide a chair under the pipe to allow  2&quot; encasement and be out of the the issue.<br />Then of course deal with where the pipe extends from under the deck.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 21:17:32 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Pool WATER grounding</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7347/Re_Pool_WATER_grounding.html#Post7347</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> ronwampler:<br />
			Yes Lynn there is a curved stainless steel 12 sq. in. bonding plate that is gasketed and bolted into the skimmer sidewall. The stainless bolt accepts a bonding lug. This is the 'Bond Safe 680- Pool Bonding Kit'. It claims UL listing. Might check out <a href="http://www.bondsafe680.com...No"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.bondsafe680.com...No</a> it's not mine. A (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:32:18 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: &amp;quot;Attic Space&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7296/Re_quot_Attic_Space_quot.html#Post7296</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> JPeer:<br />
			My Building Official thinks the same way.  The room is what the architech labeled it.  He explained that the other codes he is responsible for enforcing must all look at a structure from the same position.  Any change in use from the drawings is the owner's responsibility and should be (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 10:32:10 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: OSHA - NRTL Bulletin</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7254/Re_OSHA_NRTL_Bulletin.html#Post7254</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			The following link identifies information from OSHA on the requirement of NRTL certified equipment used in the workplace. This may be useful as a code compliance tool since most  non-dwelling inspections will also fall under the OSHA requirements. <br /><br /><a href="https://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib021610.html"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib021610.html</a><br /><br /> <br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 11:33:28 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 310.15.(B)(2)(c)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7253/Re_310_15_B_2_c.html#Post7253</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			Bryan you need to give that info to the DOT.<br />I can't tell you haw many bad joints on a bridge I have seen.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 18:12:09 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Fiberglass pool anchors...</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7243/Re_Fiberglass_pool_anchors.html#Post7243</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			Why don't they use galvanized anchors? I am not sure any kind of aluminum really holds up that well when you bury it. That is why we don't use Al GECs isn't it?]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 18:18:17 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Ground-Fault Protection for Ungrounded Solar PV Systems</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7242/Re_Ground_Fault_Protection_for.html#Post7242</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Heinz R.:<br />
			Thanks Nick and Neal. I haven't seen any ungrounded systems on the dc side either, I suppose they do exist.<br />Just trying to understand the &quot;whys&quot; of the Code. Makes it easier to remember and there really should be an underlying safety consideration for every requirement. I was trying to ferret (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:32:28 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: step down transformer</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7238/Re_step_down_transformer.html#Post7238</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> ronwampler:<br />
			Of course...an isolated electrode can not be used. The GES is a system after all and all separately derived systems and all utility services of 1ph. and 3ph. are required to be interconnected to the same system; otherwise we have voltage (potentials) between adjacent equipment fed from (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 14:54:01 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Panel Change out</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7211/Re_Panel_Change_out.html#Post7211</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> COTInspector:<br />
			My understanding is that Citizens wants any panel that is over 30 years old to be replaced. Welcome to the forum Chris, do you have anything in writing from Citizens that states they want the service upgraded and not just the panel changed? It would help in future cases like this.Ruben, Nick (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 22:20:59 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: GFCI protection for garages</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7181/Re_GFCI_protection_for_garages.html#Post7181</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Paul J Cameron:<br />
			Thanks guys, <br />Mike, I missed the bar on the right side, my book isn't in the best shape and it was right near the edge of the page. Hope to see some of you next week in Tampa.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:24:32 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Double-Insulated Tools</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7160/Re_Double_Insulated_Tools.html#Post7160</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Heinz R.:<br />
			Thanks, Mike and PSNorthrup. You've restored my belief that I was reading the Code correctly.<br />Heinz R.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:47:14 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Solar PV disconne4cts</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7148/Re_Solar_PV_disconne4cts.html#Post7148</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			I'm not sure if this was a (quote) &quot;fire&quot; - could also be the result of arcing and/or loose connection, similarly the way we see a line side meter lug burn up.  That happens all the time on meter sockets and nobody ever required a disconnect at the point of attachment.  Still a good article (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 00:26:07 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Specialty License Scope of Work</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7146/Re_Specialty_License_Scope_of_.html#Post7146</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> COTInspector:<br />
			At least the Unlimited EC was tested on pole bases and concrete.<br />I had 2 such questions on my 1999 EC test.<br />I agree with Nick just ask the ECLB.<br /><br />Neal Burdick ]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:28:22 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 680.23 (B) (2) (b) Wet - Niche Luminaires</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7141/Re_680_23_B_2_b_Wet_Niche_Lumi.html#Post7141</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: thomas</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well I stuck my head in the water, and yes the water is still cold, good thing I did not go all of the way in.... There are provisions for a #8 ground wire but i need to find a screw from a pool company, I will get them to drain the pool to niche and install a #8.<br /><br (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:19:28 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Emergency Power / Legall Requires Stand-By Power</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7090/Re_Emergency_Power_Legall_Requ.html#Post7090</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			Elevators are not usually considered a 'means of egress'. They are a required element of 'accessibilty' to upper levels. FBC requires exit stairways for egress...fire-rated interior or open exterior. Elevators can be commandeered by the Fire Dept. and during fire events normally return to (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:05:05 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Retrofit wired smoke alarms?</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7089/Re_Retrofit_wired_smoke_alarms.html#Post7089</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			Don't forget that 2007/9 FBC-Residential Section R313 now requires CO detectors for new construction when the occupancy has attached garages or Fuel Code appliances. These are to be located within 10 feet of sleeping rooms and must be in combination smoke detectors...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:29:18 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Legally required standby systems</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7058/Re_Legally_required_standby_sy.html#Post7058</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			Oops...Legally required standby system...I think that there is such a thing as a listed S.U.S.E. F.P. contoller-transfer switch. I recall one a few years ago...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:34:40 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 338.10 (B) (4)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7050/Re_338_10_B_4.html#Post7050</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			That is really no solace if the conductor does handle the full 90c ampacity but the lug on the main breaker burns up.  <img src="<<GRAEMLIN_URL>/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" /<br /><br />I am only bringing up the &quot;increasing load&quot; issue because people do continue to add loads until the main breaker (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:24:07 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: NM Cable protection</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7021/Re_NM_Cable_protection.html#Post7021</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			It is possible to route Romex in framing so that it is not subject to damage but not very likely. An 8 ft. level would be enforcible for open runs in areas subject to storage, etc. Guards might be acceptable to the AHJ but cable routed horizontally between studs is 1.poor workmanship (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:25:40 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: GEC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/7019/Re_GEC.html#Post7019</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			Exactly.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:29:35 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Elevators 620.51</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6995/Re_Elevators_620_51.html#Post6995</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			Hmmm...The Fire detector in the top of the shaft should trip only that shunt...A plaque is required in the individual elevator equipment room informing where the shunt-trip is located and that it must be reset to resume power. I would expect each elevator to have it's own shunt-trip and that (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:05:35 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Smoke/CO alarms</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6985/Re_Smoke_CO_alarms.html#Post6985</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			HA HA,<br />Actually I am in the process up upgrading my alarm system. And I have been looking for a co2/smoke to hardwire.<br />Also thinking of you a camera, to tie in also. For the back 40 building.<br />I have had some issues and my neighbor as well with vandalism.<br />And yes you should not post you are away.<br (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:22:51 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2009 UL-IAEI Inspectors Report</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6917/Re_2009_UL_IAEI_Inspectors_Rep.html#Post6917</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Please see the attachment for the 2009 UL-IAEI Inspectors Report.<br /><br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:52:31 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2010 Chapter BOD meeting in Tampa</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6905/Re_2010_Chapter_BOD_meeting_in.html#Post6905</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Joe L. DuPriest:<br />
			Fellow Board Members,<br /><br />I have been having a difficult time with my home computer as many of you know (imbeded virus sending spam e-mails), therefore, I will use this format to ensure that you have been contacted.  Please forward this information to any member you know of that may not be a (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:33:02 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: OSHA / NRTL Bulletin</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6903/Re_OSHA_NRTL_Bulletin.html#Post6903</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			Florida does not seem to have a state approved plan]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:17:40 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Arc-Fault</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6900/Re_Arc_Fault.html#Post6900</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> psnorthrup:<br />
			I think that most of us have agreed with that interpretation]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:41:00 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2008 NEC Outlet Applications Document</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6882/Re_2008_NEC_Outlet_Application.html#Post6882</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Following a recent discussion on the BOAF discussion group, Don Fuchs forwarded me this nice little checklist for 2008 outlet requirements in dwellings.  While it does have inaccuracies, it is a nice template for anyone that might like to use it.<br /><br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:53:58 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: CHINESE DRYWALL</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6837/Re_CHINESE_DRYWALL.html#Post6837</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			Bryan,<br /><br />I don't know what it means, or who it includes.  <br /><br />I have to refrain from giving opinion as I am going to bring this up next week at BCAI board meeting.  If anyone is in or near St. Augustine please feel free to join us.  If you can't stop by you are always free to send me your opinions (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:06:52 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Fuel Dispensing facilities</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6818/Re_Fuel_Dispensing_facilities.html#Post6818</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			Let's just hope some Chinese translator, writing the instructions for a troffer whip doesn't confuse MC cable with MI cable. <img src="<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:12:00 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: FS 489.503 (14)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6817/Re_FS_489_503_14.html#Post6817</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			Touchy subject.<br />My observation is....<br />Most all per say utilities now sub contract work.<br />Verizon Fios. Most all are employees except for the initial connection run to the residence. The actual installation in the home could be either one.<br /><br />Brighthouse,<br />just about all work is out sourced by (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:51:27 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Switch relocate</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6803/Re_Switch_relocate.html#Post6803</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			Just rotate the tires Nick...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:32:03 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: NFPA report on aged wiring</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6781/Re_NFPA_report_on_aged_wiring.html#Post6781</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Paul J Cameron:<br />
			Enjoy!!]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:01:11 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2008 NEC Article 338.10</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6776/Re_2008_NEC_Article_338_10.html#Post6776</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I agree, If the wiring is on the home side of the insulation it might not be much warmer than the ceiling]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:33:11 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Frequency Drive spped controller for HVAC ????</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6758/Re_Frequency_Drive_spped_contr.html#Post6758</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			I agree with Greg.  While VFD's, PLC's, and other electronic equipment can be a little funny acting at times, I don't see anyway what they are suggesting can be a true possibility for the problem.<br /><br /> ]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:05:04 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: existing building code</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6754/Re_existing_building_code.html#Post6754</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> hotsparks1:<br />
			I stay away from it as much as i can--lol  Thanks for the input]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:15:48 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re:   NEC  2008  334.15 (C)  Crawl Space???</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6726/Re_NEC_2008_334_15_C_Crawl_Spa.html#Post6726</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Mike Timpanaro:<br />
			I think the correct response is that we need to follow the code section.  Soooo....all jurisdictions should require protection for the NM cable by running boards, drill holes in floor joist, or staple NM cable on the top of the bottom cord of a floor truss.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:43:32 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Meter Registering no flow of electricity.</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6719/Re_Meter_Registering_no_flow_o.html#Post6719</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> DickWidera:<br />
			Howdy to Heinz from Dick in Hudson FL. <br /><br />I have noted your email address. Just to get you thinking about this topic, I want you to give consideration to the following fact. A regular watt hour meter, be it disc operated or digital, is not just a device to register KVA, it is also a demand (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:02:45 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 250.146(A) Thread locking means</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6705/Re_250_146_A_Thread_locking_me.html#Post6705</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			That is what the proposal to 2011 is saying.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:03:00 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: TAINTED CHINESE DRYWALL TURNS COPPER BLACK</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6700/Re_TAINTED_CHINESE_DRYWALL_TUR.html#Post6700</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			Here is another site<br /><a href="http://www.chinesedrywall.com/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.chinesedrywall.com/</a><br /><br />It is interesting what they say about water damage on the ship.<br />The stuff I saw had black mold on the back. I thought it might have been from hanging the rock before they sealed the block (stucco) but it may have been from water coming out of (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:19:46 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Guest rooms and suites Hotel</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6690/Re_Guest_rooms_and_suites_Hote.html#Post6690</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			I do not know why the plans examiner didn't catch it.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:36:04 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Draft 2011 NEC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6680/Re_Draft_2011_NEC.html#Post6680</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			From what I understand, the FBC workplan for the adoption of the 2011 NEC is being altered so that it can be adopted with the 2010 Florida Building Code in December 2011.<br /><br />However, I wouldn't be opposed to a longer cycle.  5 years would be great...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:53:28 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: NEC 2008 Appendix A-E</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6670/Re_NEC_2008_Appendix_A_E.html#Post6670</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I noted it in the course evaluation survey. I was waiting to see if they responded. I just wanted to be sure I hadn't missed something somewhere.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:34:36 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Common Questions Part 1</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6662/Re_Common_Questions_Part_1.html#Post6662</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: COTInspector</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It has been kinda dead in here, thought I get some discussions going.<br />I split it into 2 parts will that work Ruben?<br /><br />Neal Burdick<br />City of Tampa<br />Construction Inspector </div></div><br />No that's fine. Just my observation is ask multiple code section questions at once. It gets a (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:55:08 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 800.156</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6661/Re_800_156.html#Post6661</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			Well you can take take a couple of ways.<br />Regardless of cable or phone company.<br />A cat 5 cable is capable of phone or Ethernet connections.<br />Then you have WIFI connections.<br /><br />So if you have one 4 pair twisted cat5 minimum cable out to the the demarc. Then you meet the requirement I guess.<br />Or just a 6u (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:24:40 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Common Questions Part 2</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6660/Re_Common_Questions_Part_2.html#Post6660</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			It is funny you said this. In a iaei section meeting years ago. Jim Pauly was speaking on this item when it was added to the nec for the old 2&quot; pvc stub up above the ceiling . Everyone had issues on it. Finally his statement was you have been allowing this for years illegally. So why is there (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:53:31 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: FLA in Industrial Controls</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6653/Re_FLA_in_Industrial_Controls.html#Post6653</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			Very true. Same for electric signs and primary switchgear. Some of us are spread thin and wear many hats. NRTLs, nameplates and Fla P.E.s become necessary as expedients. Plan review can be very time consuming if evaluating control schematics and ladder diagrams. Throw in use of judgement and (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:07:38 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Maximum number of disconnects</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6633/Re_Maximum_number_of_disconnec.html#Post6633</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			Otay!!<br />I understand suitable for use.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:45:55 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: feeders</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6625/Re_feeders.html#Post6625</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			I agree with 32513. Assuming the mains or calculated load does not exceed the 2/0. The same would apply to replacing only one RHW leg with THWN as a cheap repair...This is not the same principle as parallel sets but similar in that each set must be identical but not with another leg of the (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:34:24 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 200.2</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6611/Re_200_2.html#Post6611</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			In the computer rooms I have seen with center tapped delta they only serve 3 phase panels with the high leg. The other 2 legs will serve a single phase 120/240 panel for the office loads.<br />Even with that, we got in trouble with some equipment that had single phase L/L loads.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:21:38 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Official 2008 NEC Effective Date</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6591/Re_Official_2008_NEC_Effective.html#Post6591</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			That is weird.  I was given the official word on September 2, that the official date would be October 1.<br /><br />No wonder everyone is so confused...<br /><br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:51:13 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Code Change 2008 at the Villages</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6573/Re_Code_Change_2008_at_the_Vil.html#Post6573</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Paul J Cameron:<br />
			I just wanted to post a brief message about the code change seminar put on by Mike Timpanaro, which I attended, in the Villages this past Saturday. I want to compliment Mike on an Excellent presentation. He had a great turnout (150)and from what I heard around the room everyone enjoyed it and (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:28:09 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Rumor Has It...</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6558/Re_Rumor_Has_It.html#Post6558</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> psnorthrup:<br />
			Plant City started enforcing the 2008 July 1, so far it has not been a problem, ]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:32:31 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Nylon Jacket on Insulated Conductors</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6555/Re_Nylon_Jacket_on_Insulated_C.html#Post6555</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			So, in other words, it is possible that the tears can affect the insulation.  I'm not sure what prompted that letter or email, but pay close attention to how he worded it, especially in the first paragraph...<br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">...no effect on the <span style="font-weight: bold">insulation VALUES</span> of the cable...</div></div> <br /><br />But the cable insulation (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:46:16 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: PV Work-Around Attempt</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6550/Re_PV_Work_Around_Attempt.html#Post6550</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Raymfl:<br />
			I'll have to wait and see what he comes up with for the load calc.   The PV system, by estimate, should save the owner about 200.00 a month.  This is an ac system with 42 panels and an Enphase inverter on each panel. He has this linked to the Enphase web site where it shows the physical (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:25:25 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 110.26 (C) (2)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6533/Re_110_26_C_2.html#Post6533</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> John Desjardins:<br />
			I said no before. Still say no. There is no substantiation for an alternate method.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:57:17 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: FREE 2008 Code Changes Seminar Sumter County (The Villages)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6520/Re_FREE_2008_Code_Changes_Semi.html#Post6520</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Thanks Nick.<br /><br />I am going to do my best to attend this seminar.  I have been looking forward to meeting Mike for a couple years now.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:05:14 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Interesting conundrum about 406.11</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6508/Re_Interesting_conundrum_about.html#Post6508</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> psnorthrup:<br />
			Never mind, I see where that came from]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:05:29 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: V/D and the NEC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6493/Re_V_D_and_the_NEC.html#Post6493</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			V/D is I*R heat loss so I like seeing it in the energy code...I look at long runs with significant load for conductor sizing...my main concern with oversizing the circuit is to educate designers and contractors to additionally oversize the equipment grounding conductor as required in NEC (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:38:54 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Why TVs get blown up in Md</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6474/Re_Why_TVs_get_blown_up_in_Md.html#Post6474</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			That is new construction, less than 4 months old]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:46:19 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2008 NEC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6458/Re_2008_NEC.html#Post6458</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			Well then post your pictures and start the discussions.<br /> ]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:40:00 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Solar PV Links</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6428/Re_Solar_PV_Links.html#Post6428</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I just went through the process for getting your solar PV system &quot;certified&quot; and which systems they will even look at. It is clear this is not intended to spur any innovation. There are only a handful of systems that qualify from Florida based companies and they are all based on fairly old (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:21:01 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Florida Building Code Update</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6423/Re_Florida_Building_Code_Updat.html#Post6423</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Paul J Cameron:<br />
			Florida Building Code Update<br /><br />Dear all interested parties:<br /><br />The purpose of this email is to provide you with an update regarding the current update to the 2007 Florida Building Code.  At the June 9, 2009 Commission meeting, the Commission held a rule adoption hearing regarding Rule 9B-3.047 for (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:15:57 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2011 NEC - ROP</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6420/Re_2011_NEC_ROP.html#Post6420</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Following is a link to the 2011 NEC – Record of Proposals.  While we are still in the midst of adopting the 2008, here is your opportunity to see what changes are potentially coming down the road and perhaps submit a comment on those which interest you.<br /><br /> <br /><br /><a href="http://www.nfpa.org/Assets/Files/PDF/ROP/70-A2010-ROP.pdf"  rel="nofollow" (...)</a>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:15:41 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Transformer primary disconnect</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6419/Re_Transformer_primary_disconn.html#Post6419</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			I too am curious like Paul.  What is / are your concerns?]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:31:40 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Bus Duct</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6418/Re_Bus_Duct.html#Post6418</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> barbeer:<br />
			I can see nothing in 368 that disallows the other piping systems, nor 110. From there maybe a judgement call.....]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:01:27 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Let's Vote</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6399/Re_Let_s_Vote.html#Post6399</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> John Desjardins:<br />
			Didn't think of that. It's fine and I think we clarified it.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:30:34 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2008 NEC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6398/Re_2008_NEC.html#Post6398</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> John Desjardins:<br />
			Paul,<br />If it says &quot;in accordance with the current NEC&quot; as of July 1, 2009 the current Code in Fl is 2008 and would require GFCI.The Manufacturer is referencing the REAL NEC and not the Florida version for his listing.Again I caution that the Electrical Code in Florida is not the NEC it's the (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:24:26 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Rule 9B – 3.047, GFCI Protection</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6379/Re_Rule_9B_3_047_GFCI_Protecti.html#Post6379</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Here is one commentary on the issue I was able to find online:<br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">FBC adopts 2008 NEC, exempting GFCI requirement on residential pools<br /><br />FSPA President Alan Cooper, &quot;This epitomizes what our government relations program is all about.  Further, it is an excellent example of the importance of (...)</div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:58:26 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Section 250.94</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6357/Re_Section_250_94.html#Post6357</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I think that once it becomes apparent that a bus bar was provided for the other users, they would quickly adopt to using it. Less parts they have to use. The only real problem is when they decide to come into the house from the other end, away from the service entrance. That is when I usually (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:26:46 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: subpanel - generator hookup</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6346/Re_subpanel_generator_hookup.html#Post6346</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ron Wampler:<br />
			p.s....if the genset looses the neutral then the line to neutral voltage will vary between 0 to 240 volts dependent upon the circuit resistance...(ohm's law). This is if the neutral loss is at the genset or before the circuit...some current might try to flow thru the earth connections but the (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:29:33 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 310.15(B)(4)(A)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6265/Re_310_15_B_4_A.html#Post6265</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			It has been there the last several cycles. Sometime ago it was moved from I believe the notes section at the end of table 310.16 <br />When table310.15(b)(6) was note eight??<br /><br />But anyway you need to keep reading the section you stated not just part (4)(a) but also (4)(b) and (4)(c)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:53:22 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Low voltage</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6257/Re_Low_voltage.html#Post6257</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			The problem is getting permits and inspections on homes already CO'd, especially from the 'national' installers like the big telecom and cable companies.<br /><br />Some of the worst installations I have seen are the DISH SYSTEMS (DIRECT TV, DISH NETWORK).  Namely the grounding practices and methods.<br /><br />Not (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:21:24 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: SB 2026 and the 2008 NEC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6244/Re_SB_2026_and_the_2008_NEC.html#Post6244</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			It no longer appears that Senate Bill 2026 will have any effect on the adoption of the 2008 NEC.  The entire Bill has all but been rewritten by committee...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:46:03 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Key Changes to the 2008 NEC / 2007 FBC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6234/Re_Key_Changes_to_the_2008_NEC.html#Post6234</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			I know 2008 NEC addressed the 3 wire feeder, I wondered if Florida did, in this end run around adoption of 2008.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:47:05 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: UL/IAEI Inspectors Meeting Reports</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6196/Re_UL_IAEI_Inspectors_Meeting_.html#Post6196</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			The UL/IAEI Inspectors Meeting Report from the 2008 IAEI Section Meetings is now available on the UL Regulators page at UL.com.  Please see the link below. <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.ul.com/regulators/2008_UL_IAEI_InspectorsMeetingReport.pdf"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.ul.com/regulators/2008_UL_IAEI_InspectorsMeetingReport.pdf</a><br /><br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:05:39 CDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: 2011 NEC Proposal, Comments, Reports</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6195/Re_2011_NEC_Proposal_Comments_.html#Post6195</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			If you are interesting in viewing all the Proposals, Comments, and other Reports relating to the 2011 - NEC code change process (earlier editions as well), follow the directions provided:<br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Getting to the 2011 NEC Forum<br /><br />Using your web browser, go to the NEMA website at [url=www.nema.org]<a href="http://www.nema.org"  rel="nofollow" (...)</a></div></div>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:42:15 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Back to the basics</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6190/Re_Back_to_the_basics.html#Post6190</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			A water barrier wrap, a pan, a diverter shield, something effective but practical.<br /><br />]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:55:24 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Bonding steel framing?</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6169/Re_Bonding_steel_framing.html#Post6169</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> gfretwell:<br />
			Actually I would not be opposed to expanding the existing Florida FBC rule on bonding steel studs to also bonding aluminum siding, soffit etc if there is electrical wiring or other equipment installed on or through it. The real question would be &quot;how?&quot;.<br />The Christmas light scenario is not as (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:09:15 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Mobile Homes</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6165/Re_Mobile_Homes.html#Post6165</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Mike Timpanaro:<br />
			Whatever a electrical contractor or (homeowner) wires is required to be permitted, and inspected per State Statute, FBC, and FAC.  Doesn't matter if it is a house, shed, well pump, service, or wiring to a structure under NEC 550.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:26:35 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Cypress tounge and groove ceilings</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6147/Re_Cypress_tounge_and_groove_c.html#Post6147</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Ruben Rocha:<br />
			Yea that don't solve it.<br />The problem is it looks like. 2X4 nailed between the trusses with the fan box screwed to the bottom of the 2X4 so if you remove the box you only have the depth of the box plus the vinyl. The box is currently flush with the drywall. So the old work fan boxes don't have (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:44:27 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: APRIL 2009 - Swimming Pool Safety Month</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6139/Re_APRIL_2009_Swimming_Pool_Sa.html#Post6139</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			The final version is in Section E3304 of the FBC - R and Section 2705 of the FBC, 2007 Edition with Glitch Supplement...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:09:58 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Generators</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6111/Re_Generators.html#Post6111</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Alan L. Waters:<br />
			To aire on the side of caution I decided to quote the customer for a new conduit with new start wires. Albeit it looks like we could install it with the battery charger and be legal.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:34:03 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Electrical TAC</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6103/Re_Electrical_TAC.html#Post6103</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Mike Timpanaro:<br />
			As Nick pointed out:<br /><br /><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is an underlying story here that nobody is reporting on. That is how long and hard the battle is to adopt the new code. I really hope that with the 2008 NEC, all the parties who vote for it will stand behind it when it comes time to enforce the &quot;tough parts.&quot; </div></div><br /><br (...)]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:24:50 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: FBC Electrical TAC Committee Meeting</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6088/Re_FBC_Electrical_TAC_Committe.html#Post6088</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Nick Sasso:<br />
			Here is a link to the agenda:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.flrules.org/gateway/readFile.asp?sid=6&amp;tid=6685160&amp;type=1&amp;File=9B.doc"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.flrules.org/gateway/readFile.asp?sid=6&amp;tid=6685160&amp;type=1&amp;File=9B.doc</a>]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:01:22 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Selective Coordination</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6079/Re_Selective_Coordination.html#Post6079</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Vince DellaCroce:<br />
			Great info.  I'll be getting in touch with Jeff to see if he is able to attend a future meeting.<br /><br />Vince Della Croce<br />Secretary<br />Treasure Coast Division]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:32:31 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: ENT 362.10 (2) Exception to (2)</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6078/Re_ENT_362_10_2_Exception_to_2.html#Post6078</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Vince DellaCroce:<br />
			Yes]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:29:19 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: hi-rise Main Electrical Room Layout</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6068/Re_hi_rise_Main_Electrical_Roo.html#Post6068</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Mike Timpanaro:<br />
			Joe, I agree with you 100%.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:28:16 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Inspectors noted problems prior to electrocution</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6026/Re_Inspectors_noted_problems_p.html#Post6026</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> barbeer:<br />
			Two words for you.......... low bidder.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:42:28 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: NFPA News</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/6006/Re_NFPA_News.html#Post6006</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> Bryan Holland:<br />
			Thanks Neal.  It will be interestng to see how this develops...]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:58:34 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: sunrooms</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/5997/Re_sunrooms.html#Post5997</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> John Desjardins:<br />
			I agree with Bryan. In Indian River County that's how we made the determination.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:01:30 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Officials: Electrical Cord Cause Of Costco Fire</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/5996/Re_Officials_Electrical_Cord_C.html#Post5996</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> hotsparks1:<br />
			Its amazing how many extension cords i see in commercial buildings.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:32:59 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: Ground wire as traveler to make 3-way system</title>
			<link>http://www.iaeifl.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/5976/Re_Ground_wire_as_traveler_to_.html#Post5976</link>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[<b>Posted by</b> hotsparks1:<br />
			It is very sad.Its also sad that it looks like this is a common practice.]]>
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:48:34 CST</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
