I know each jurisdiction has their own policy and procedure for how inspections are made, however, I am interested in how some of you would handle a couple of different situations.
What is your policy on alterations made after an inspection. For example, you make a rough inspection on a single family home. You are quite familiar with the builder and contractor that normally performs the work. A month or so later, you come out to make a final inspection and notice several alterations or additions have been made to the electrical system. Additional lighting outlets, some low voltage work, and other misc. alterations you distintcly remember not being there on the rough inspection. What do you do?
Also, you are performing a rough inspection. You find a issue that merits failure and tag the job. You get called back the next day. The contractor makes the repair to the tagged failure, however, on the way back out of the house, you see another issue that needs correcting and would normally merit a failure. Some how you missed it on the original inspection.
A: Do you re-fail the job, even though it was missed the first time around?
B: Do you make an advisory requesting the contractor fix the problem and make a note to check on it on another day.
C: Is there a third option.
_________________________
Bryan P. Holland, MCP