MENU
Florida Chapter Officers
BOD Chairman
Dan Prater
President
Ted Licitra
1st Vice President
Mark Deegan
2nd Vice President
Richard Wheelus
3rd Vice President
Vince Dellacroce
Chaplain
James Douglas
Secretary
Joe DuPriest
Treasurer
Eric L Wasser
Parliamentarian
Tim Wright
Who's Online
0 registered (), 11 Guests and 21 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
ddasa, mcfs509, Spike, dsf, Christoper
519 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
Nick Sasso 5
Bryan Holland 5
Heinz R. 2
Mike Timpanaro 1
SOwings 1
TerryR 1
Google Search
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#6374 - 06/13/09 01:52 PM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: John Desjardins]
gfretwell
Unregistered


I still think it is a dangerous precedent to use a scrap of paper included in the box as your electric code. Particularly when that product may have been designed offshore and the instructions translated by someone to whom English is not their primary language.
I did like it better when the FBC took the NEC unaltered, although I still have problems with the NEC process.

Top
#6375 - 06/13/09 07:18 PM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: ]
John Desjardins Offline
Mechanic Member

Registered: 08/07/03
Posts: 306
Loc: Body=NC, Head & Heart=Florida
Originally Posted By: gfretwell
I still think it is a dangerous precedent to use a scrap of paper included in the box as your electric code. Particularly when that product may have been designed offshore and the instructions translated by someone to whom English is not their primary language.
I did like it better when the FBC took the NEC unaltered, although I still have problems with the NEC process.


You know better then that I'm sure. You meet all of the requirements.That's why it's so important, and I see this all of the time with Electricians, to not get stuck in just the NEC. It is very complex these days.

Top
#6376 - 06/13/09 08:46 PM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: John Desjardins]
Ruben Rocha Offline
Senior Member
*****

Registered: 05/24/00
Posts: 767
Well as John has stated before and I agree with.
Even in past code cycles.
When you deal with listed equipment. The installation guideline usually takes precedence if you want to keep the listing.
Of course you could always start with the UL white book and go from there. (Shudder)

Top
#6377 - 06/13/09 10:19 PM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: Ruben Rocha]
gfretwell
Unregistered


No I don't know better. We are entering a global economy where the installation instructions come in 6 languages.
As far as I know the "listing" really only says this thing will contain the fire within the wiring box when it fails and I am not sure the inspection of the instructions goes much beyond the minimum requirements to safely install the equipment for THAT series of tests.
I understand you trust companies like Pentair but what about when it is Sokitume motors?

As for listing vs safety vs 110.3(B), I only have to bring up "classified breakers" or the Ideal 65 wire nut.

There needs to be a uniform state code that goes, no matter what it is. We have enough local interpretation as it is. Stuff that is perfectly legal in "X" jurisdiction is a tag in "Y" or "Z". How can a contractor work like that? It causes a disrespect for all the codes.

Top
#6380 - 06/15/09 07:59 AM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: ]
Bryan Holland Offline

Secretary
*****

Registered: 10/05/04
Posts: 1622
Loc: City of North Port
Here is one commentary on the issue I was able to find online:

Quote:
FBC adopts 2008 NEC, exempting GFCI requirement on residential pools

FSPA President Alan Cooper, "This epitomizes what our government relations program is all about. Further, it is an excellent example of the importance of having a swimming pool contractor on the FBC."

On Tuesday the Florida Building Commission (FBC) held a final rule hearing on glitch rule 9B-3.047, which encompassed a number of proposed changes to the 2007 Florida Building Code (the code). Most important to the pool industry was the 2008 NEC discussion.

In April the FBC voted to adopt the 2008 NEC, but exempt the GFCI requirement on residential pools. However, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) and others received word of this action and were in attendance on Tuesday. Testimony from a NEMA representative and an electrical contractor asked the FBC to reverse their original decision and adopt the 2008 NEC in total. Representatives from FSPA and other groups provided testimony to rebut the NEMA claims and encourage the FBC to stand by their original decision.

Larry Brown, FSPA Central Florida member and electrical contractor for Mid Florida Pools, did a superb job rebutting the NEMA testimony. In addition, comments were made to the FBC by UPSA members. To sum up the discussion, Commissioner Ken Gregory spoke to his fellow Commissioners asking them to vote down a motion to adopt the 2008 NEC in its entirety. The FBC agreed with him and the testimony the pool industry provided, ultimately voting down the motion 16-6. The original decision to adopt the 2008 NEC except for the GFCI requirement on residential pools withstood.

Also note that the FBC voted to incorporate into the glitch rule the 64E-9, F.A.C., public pool code revisions.

Read this story in its entirety in the July issue of Florida Pool Pro (sm).
_________________________
Bryan P. Holland, MCP

Top
#6382 - 06/15/09 09:33 AM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: Bryan Holland]
Nick Sasso Offline

Post-A-Holic Member
****

Registered: 11/08/01
Posts: 1451
Loc: West Palm Beach
I'm sure he's very proud of himself.

However there is such a thing as a rule challenge (challenge to an adopted rule). In this particular case, the NEC is the minimum standard for electrical safety and the adoption of this rule makes things less safe. I don't give a hoot if there is a proposal like this in the 2011 changes, because it was probably put there by the same group of people.

Bottom line is that a person will have a lesser degree of electrical safety swimming in a residential pool than if they were to swim in a commercial pool. This rule is NOT Florida specific, in my opinion. It's just plain stupid. It is merely a watering down of the safety requirements of the NEC.

I think there would be merit if someone were to challenge the rule, to get rid of it. Reason - SAFETY.



Edited by Nick Sasso (06/15/09 09:34 AM)
_________________________

Top
#6384 - 06/15/09 12:18 PM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: Nick Sasso]
gfretwell
Unregistered


I agree with the idea that Florida should accept the NEC unaltered and I also agree the GFCI is a good idea. I am only complaining about the idea that we should let whatever a manufacturer decides to suggest in his instructions should be able to trump what the code panel has decided.
Again, what do you do when someone goes "instruction shopping" and simply buys the pump that doesn't say this? (I bet there is one).
An unscrupulous person could photo shop the instructions to take out that line. If it is a "promo" part number pump (in house model) you might have real trouble proving that.
That is no way to run a building department.

Top
#6387 - 06/15/09 01:36 PM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: ]
John Desjardins Offline
Mechanic Member

Registered: 08/07/03
Posts: 306
Loc: Body=NC, Head & Heart=Florida
The manufacturers instructions only trump the Code IF they are more stringent. The Commission has messed things up. If there is a pump out there that doesn't reference the NEC or GFCI rotection ( and there isn't ) then it could be installed without GFCI protection in 1&2 family.

Top
#6388 - 06/15/09 02:43 PM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: John Desjardins]
gfretwell
Unregistered


Again you are saying the building officials of Florida are depending on manufacturers to fix/circumvent their electrical code.
It makes me so proud.

Top
#6389 - 06/15/09 03:07 PM Re: 2008 NEC [Re: John Desjardins]
Kevin Bouton Offline
New Member

Registered: 06/15/09
Posts: 1
Contractors are looking for documentation that Florida has adopted the NEC2008 effective July 1st for application of permit. Has anyone seen documentation stating the adoption is going into effect July 1st?

Top
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >



Active Topics
May Meeting Minutes
by Bryan Holland
05/17/12 02:05 PM
May Meeting Announcement
by Bryan Holland
05/08/12 07:58 AM
Visual Alarms
by Nick Sasso
05/02/12 03:55 PM
Nonmetallic Extensions
by Nick Sasso
04/25/12 03:33 PM
Selective Coordination of Circuit Breakers
by Heinz R.
04/24/12 05:03 PM
May
M Tu W Th F Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Featured Member
123
123
Registered: 08/08/11
Posts: 0
Forum Stats
519 Members
29 Forums
1892 Topics
8569 Posts

Max Online: 53 @ 03/30/12 04:16 PM
Uploaded Pictures
Can You Spot The Electrical Violation?
1948 Signalite Fuse
Portable Generator Grounding
2011 Florida Gulf Coast Division - Seminar
Knob and tube in industrial application
1920's Duplex Radio Outlet
Random Gallery Image