|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
#7139 - 04/16/10 04:01 PM
Re: Pool Water Bonding
[Re: Mike Timpanaro]
|
Mechanic Member
Registered: 04/23/07
Posts: 115
Loc: Plant City
|
Ruben; I wouldn't look for the TCC to go too near this anytime in the near future, this was a very unpopular change, If you remember it was a proposal for the 2005 cycle, and was rejected, if you remember,when that proposal was read at the Southern Section meeting, it got a big laugh when Mark Ode spoke against it,________________________________________________________________ 17-167 Log #1888 NEC-P17 Final Action: Accept ( 680.26(B)(6) ) ________________________________________________________________ Submitter: Frederic P. Hartwell, Hartwell Electrical Services, Inc. Comment on Proposal No: 17-120 Recommendation: The proposal should be rejected. Substantiation: Water cannot be bonded. Suffice it to say that this proposal produced the highest reading on the laugh meter at the IAEI annual meeting, as a nationally recognized NEC expert described the evident futility of making such connections using hydraulically crimped connectors (“but the water just oozed out”) or exothermic welding (“but the water extinguished the fuse”) etc. Metal parts can and should be bonded to provide an equipotential plane in
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#7142 - 04/16/10 07:34 PM
Re: Pool Water Bonding
[Re: psnorthrup]
|
Senior Member
   
Registered: 05/24/00
Posts: 767
|
Ruben; I wouldn't look for the TCC to go too near this anytime in the near future, this was a very unpopular change, If you remember it was a proposal for the 2005 cycle, and was rejected, if you remember,when that proposal was read at the Southern Section meeting, it got a big laugh when Mark Ode spoke against it,________________________________________________________________ 17-167 Log #1888 NEC-P17 Final Action: Accept ( 680.26(B)(6) ) ________________________________________________________________ Submitter: Frederic P. Hartwell, Hartwell Electrical Services, Inc. Comment on Proposal No: 17-120 Recommendation: The proposal should be rejected. Substantiation: Water cannot be bonded. Suffice it to say that this proposal produced the highest reading on the laugh meter at the IAEI annual meeting, as a nationally recognized NEC expert described the evident futility of making such connections using hydraulically crimped connectors (“but the water just oozed out”) or exothermic welding (“but the water extinguished the fuse”) etc. Metal parts can and should be bonded to provide an equipotential plane in Right or wrong. ridiculous or not it is in print now! So the AHJ has no choice but to enforce the requirement. So maybe the TCC will amend or change it. Remember the seu temp rating issue a few cycles back? It was a oversight but we lived with it for years.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Registered: 03/14/11
Posts: 0
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|