MENU
Florida Chapter Officers
BOD Chairman
Dan Prater
President
Ted Licitra
1st Vice President
Mark Deegan
2nd Vice President
Richard Wheelus
3rd Vice President
Vince Dellacroce
Chaplain
James Douglas
Secretary
Joe DuPriest
Treasurer
Eric L Wasser
Parliamentarian
Tim Wright
Who's Online
0 registered (), 4 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
ddasa, mcfs509, Spike, dsf, Christoper
519 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
Nick Sasso 5
Bryan Holland 5
Heinz R. 2
TerryR 1
Mike Timpanaro 1
Google Search
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#8382 - 09/21/11 10:16 AM Re: Transformers and 110.26(A) [Re: Joe L. DuPriest]
Bryan Holland Offline

Secretary
*****

Registered: 10/05/04
Posts: 1622
Loc: City of North Port
There is no doubt appliances located in closets, attic spaces, & attics make it extremely difficult for compliance with the NEC requirement for working & dedicated equipment space.

That being said, the installer has several options to come into compliance. If space is not provided for an actual disconnecting means, the a "unit swtich" can be installed. If there are no provisions for a "unit switch", a breaker lock-out device can be installed.

I will admit I have approved disconnecting means located with one or more working space dimensions NOT in full compliance, but where I was readily & easily able to approach, examine, operate, and inspect the equipment without resorting to acrobatics or other unsafe practices.

But those are exceptions to the rule, not the rule...
_________________________
Bryan P. Holland, MCP

Top
#8383 - 09/21/11 12:04 PM Re: Transformers and 110.26(A) [Re: Joe L. DuPriest]
Joe L. DuPriest Offline
Apprentice Member
*****

Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 33
Loc: Orlando Fl.
Several good thought provoking opinions given. Odd how a string can take a life of it's own. Going from 110.26 working space for a transformer to equipment located in closets, attics, and such. How maybe it shouldn't really apply to receptacles and switches, to judgement calls, to absolutely applied in all cases. Would someone actually try to verify the torque of transformer lugs while it was still energized? If you have a transformer that is being supplied correctly yet the output is incorrect, ie single phase rather than three phase, would you really have to remove the cover to realize that there was a bad connection or an open winding? Going back to the original question, and from your opinions, the working clearance as outlined in 110.26 would be required.
Again some good opinions. Thanks.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2



Active Topics
May Meeting Minutes
by Bryan Holland
05/17/12 02:05 PM
May Meeting Announcement
by Bryan Holland
05/08/12 07:58 AM
Visual Alarms
by Nick Sasso
05/02/12 03:55 PM
Nonmetallic Extensions
by Nick Sasso
04/25/12 03:33 PM
Selective Coordination of Circuit Breakers
by Heinz R.
04/24/12 05:03 PM
May
M Tu W Th F Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Featured Member
JBD
JBD
Registered: 03/20/10
Posts: 0
Forum Stats
519 Members
29 Forums
1892 Topics
8569 Posts

Max Online: 53 @ 03/30/12 04:16 PM
Uploaded Pictures
Can You Spot The Electrical Violation?
1948 Signalite Fuse
Portable Generator Grounding
2011 Florida Gulf Coast Division - Seminar
Knob and tube in industrial application
1920's Duplex Radio Outlet
Random Gallery Image